<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Air Jordan 1 Retro High &#8211; Blue Sapphire &#8211; Neon Turqoise</title> <atom:link href="http://sneakernews.com/2009/02/03/air-jordan-i-retro-high-blue-sapphire-neon-turqoise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://sneakernews.com/2009/02/03/air-jordan-i-retro-high-blue-sapphire-neon-turqoise/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 01:34:40 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: IVII</title><link>http://sneakernews.com/2009/02/03/air-jordan-i-retro-high-blue-sapphire-neon-turqoise/comment-page-1/#comment-15723</link> <dc:creator>IVII</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 22:21:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://sneakernews.com/2009/02/03/air-jordan-i-retro-high-blue-sapphire-neon-turqoise/#comment-15723</guid> <description>where are we going...?!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>where are we going&#8230;?!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Red09</title><link>http://sneakernews.com/2009/02/03/air-jordan-i-retro-high-blue-sapphire-neon-turqoise/comment-page-1/#comment-15669</link> <dc:creator>Red09</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 02:45:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://sneakernews.com/2009/02/03/air-jordan-i-retro-high-blue-sapphire-neon-turqoise/#comment-15669</guid> <description>these go extra hard. i was goin to get the other ones, but these make me want these even more.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>these go extra hard. i was goin to get the other ones, but these make me want these even more.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: TreyMarc</title><link>http://sneakernews.com/2009/02/03/air-jordan-i-retro-high-blue-sapphire-neon-turqoise/comment-page-1/#comment-15619</link> <dc:creator>TreyMarc</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 16:13:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://sneakernews.com/2009/02/03/air-jordan-i-retro-high-blue-sapphire-neon-turqoise/#comment-15619</guid> <description>The change to patent leather just went from bad to worse. Looks like a knock off AJ1...Kicks are wayyyyy to blue...need some other colors in there. Throw in some black in there like dude said above...And yea i see nothing NEON turqoise either...hummm did i miss something here...anyhow this is wackness...come out with some better colorways and STOP making those Jordan Fusion AF1 garbage or else Nike will be looking for some BAILOUT MONEY!!!...lolol...wtf? get your sht together Jordan Brand!!! You&#039;re fcking up fast...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The change to patent leather just went from bad to worse. Looks like a knock off AJ1&#8230;Kicks are wayyyyy to blue&#8230;need some other colors in there. Throw in some black in there like dude said above&#8230;And yea i see nothing NEON turqoise either&#8230;hummm did i miss something here&#8230;anyhow this is wackness&#8230;come out with some better colorways and STOP making those Jordan Fusion AF1 garbage or else Nike will be looking for some BAILOUT MONEY!!!&#8230;lolol&#8230;wtf? get your sht together Jordan Brand!!! You&#8217;re fcking up fast&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: bra</title><link>http://sneakernews.com/2009/02/03/air-jordan-i-retro-high-blue-sapphire-neon-turqoise/comment-page-1/#comment-15581</link> <dc:creator>bra</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 00:29:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://sneakernews.com/2009/02/03/air-jordan-i-retro-high-blue-sapphire-neon-turqoise/#comment-15581</guid> <description>gross. nylon and patent leather are both bad on this
why not a combo of suede nubuck and fullgrain leather.
the yellowish sole is ugly too
black is a better match. should have black laces, swoosh, and midsole.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gross. nylon and patent leather are both bad on this<br
/> why not a combo of suede nubuck and fullgrain leather.<br
/> the yellowish sole is ugly too<br
/> black is a better match. should have black laces, swoosh, and midsole.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JORDNKINGBETTERTHANALLYALL</title><link>http://sneakernews.com/2009/02/03/air-jordan-i-retro-high-blue-sapphire-neon-turqoise/comment-page-1/#comment-15579</link> <dc:creator>JORDNKINGBETTERTHANALLYALL</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 00:03:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://sneakernews.com/2009/02/03/air-jordan-i-retro-high-blue-sapphire-neon-turqoise/#comment-15579</guid> <description>CEELOC SUX ASS</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CEELOC SUX ASS</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Deez</title><link>http://sneakernews.com/2009/02/03/air-jordan-i-retro-high-blue-sapphire-neon-turqoise/comment-page-1/#comment-15571</link> <dc:creator>Deez</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 22:10:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://sneakernews.com/2009/02/03/air-jordan-i-retro-high-blue-sapphire-neon-turqoise/#comment-15571</guid> <description>Way better, looks like collector shoe for the right price, its a def. cop</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Way better, looks like collector shoe for the right price, its a def. cop</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: johny</title><link>http://sneakernews.com/2009/02/03/air-jordan-i-retro-high-blue-sapphire-neon-turqoise/comment-page-1/#comment-15560</link> <dc:creator>johny</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 21:02:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://sneakernews.com/2009/02/03/air-jordan-i-retro-high-blue-sapphire-neon-turqoise/#comment-15560</guid> <description>nylon was way better.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nylon was way better.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
