<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Nike Air Max 1 ND &#8211; Safari Pack &#8211; July &#8217;09</title> <atom:link href="http://sneakernews.com/2009/06/01/nike-air-max-1-nd-safari-pack-july-09/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://sneakernews.com/2009/06/01/nike-air-max-1-nd-safari-pack-july-09/</link> <description></description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 05:02:14 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <item><title>By: assa</title><link>http://sneakernews.com/2009/06/01/nike-air-max-1-nd-safari-pack-july-09/comment-page-1/#comment-266680</link> <dc:creator>assa</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 15:13:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://sneakernews.com/?p=42396#comment-266680</guid> <description>estas sapatilhas sao muito caras :S </description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>estas sapatilhas sao muito caras :S</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Wez........</title><link>http://sneakernews.com/2009/06/01/nike-air-max-1-nd-safari-pack-july-09/comment-page-1/#comment-27732</link> <dc:creator>Wez........</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 23:17:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://sneakernews.com/?p=42396#comment-27732</guid> <description>Agree with Snks....
Just got my pair deivered, Colorways alright but the the grey panel section at the front above the mesh toe and below the bottom of the lace is a crap shape, no flow to it!!! Bring back the old ways!!!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with Snks&#8230;.</p><p>Just got my pair deivered, Colorways alright but the the grey panel section at the front above the mesh toe and below the bottom of the lace is a crap shape, no flow to it!!! Bring back the old ways!!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: STFU</title><link>http://sneakernews.com/2009/06/01/nike-air-max-1-nd-safari-pack-july-09/comment-page-1/#comment-25973</link> <dc:creator>STFU</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 04:19:01 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://sneakernews.com/?p=42396#comment-25973</guid> <description>Cry,Cry,Cry,Bitch,Bitch,Bitch,stop Bitching about dope ass sneakers. I mean you guys cry about fusions,retro jays and now the shape of Air Max 1&#039;s are you fucking serious ? There&#039;s nothing wrong with the shape of these Air Max Ones they look the same like always and the only thing I see new with the AM1&#039;s is how Nike adds new materials and concepts to them and that&#039;s all I see. You haters might need to go to an eye doctor if you cant see the dopeness in these kicks</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cry,Cry,Cry,Bitch,Bitch,Bitch,stop Bitching about dope ass sneakers. I mean you guys cry about fusions,retro jays and now the shape of Air Max 1&#8242;s are you fucking serious ? There&#8217;s nothing wrong with the shape of these Air Max Ones they look the same like always and the only thing I see new with the AM1&#8242;s is how Nike adds new materials and concepts to them and that&#8217;s all I see. You haters might need to go to an eye doctor if you cant see the dopeness in these kicks</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: WHY NIKE?????</title><link>http://sneakernews.com/2009/06/01/nike-air-max-1-nd-safari-pack-july-09/comment-page-1/#comment-25321</link> <dc:creator>WHY NIKE?????</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 20:41:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://sneakernews.com/?p=42396#comment-25321</guid> <description>The shape of ALL new air max 1 models since late 2008 and 2009 is fucked up, off, strange, ugly......
people who don&#039;t see that are probably just newbies or have really bad eyes.
if you FEEL an air max 1 model like they used to be, you can&#039;t deny.
R.I.P. air max 1 :&#039;(</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The shape of ALL new air max 1 models since late 2008 and 2009 is fucked up, off, strange, ugly&#8230;&#8230;<br
/> people who don&#8217;t see that are probably just newbies or have really bad eyes.<br
/> if you FEEL an air max 1 model like they used to be, you can&#8217;t deny.<br
/> R.I.P. air max 1 :&#8217;(</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: rev one*der</title><link>http://sneakernews.com/2009/06/01/nike-air-max-1-nd-safari-pack-july-09/comment-page-1/#comment-24736</link> <dc:creator>rev one*der</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 03:23:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://sneakernews.com/?p=42396#comment-24736</guid> <description>ya&#039;ll n*ggas buggin, these goin in the collection early...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ya&#8217;ll n*ggas buggin, these goin in the collection early&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: snks</title><link>http://sneakernews.com/2009/06/01/nike-air-max-1-nd-safari-pack-july-09/comment-page-1/#comment-24693</link> <dc:creator>snks</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:44:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://sneakernews.com/?p=42396#comment-24693</guid> <description>@ Michael: just compair the noses of a AM1 from the year 2000 or earlier and a AM1 from 2009.. you&#039;ll see what i mean.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Michael: just compair the noses of a AM1 from the year 2000 or earlier and a AM1 from 2009.. you&#8217;ll see what i mean.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: sneakers_yo</title><link>http://sneakernews.com/2009/06/01/nike-air-max-1-nd-safari-pack-july-09/comment-page-1/#comment-24691</link> <dc:creator>sneakers_yo</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 19:37:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://sneakernews.com/?p=42396#comment-24691</guid> <description>The shape does look off...mayb the sample was in women sizes ?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The shape does look off&#8230;mayb the sample was in women sizes ?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
