Founder & Editor In Chief
Yu-Ming Wu
@mryumingwu
liquidrice.com

Managing Editor
Aaron Kr.

Editors
Aaron Hope
Brendan Dunne
John Kim
    Top Categories
  • Home
  • Air Jordan
  • Air Force 1
  • Air Max
  • Adidas
  • Basketball
  • Celebrity Feet
  • Foamposite
  • Kobe Bryant
  • Kevin Durant
  • Nike SB
  • LeBron James
  • Just Released
  • Upcoming Sneakers

  • All Categories
Archives


By John K. · Published Dec 02nd, 2010

Air Jordan XIII ‘Flint’ – 1998 – 2005 – 2010 | Comparison

Black Friday may been a successful shopping day for you if you copped the Air Jordan XIII ‘Flint’, a shoe that was widely praised for its close-to-the-OG interpretation. Although 3M reflective material was left out of the upper ballistic nylon, the shoe itself seemed like a carbon-copy of the original, and a good amount of the much-maligned quality issues with Jordan Retro releases seemed to be non-existent in this retro. Here’s a quick comparison of three Flint XIIIs – one 2010 Retro, another a 2005 Retro, and the third, an original pair from 1998. Obviously the ’10 version is a lot more vibrant in color compared to the two older versions simply due to its youth, but perhaps the difference is color isn’t from the aging process, but just a completely different shade as a whole. There are more comparison shots after the jump, juxtaposing the boxes, panther-eye jewels, bottom soles, and more, so check out the gallery of images after the jump and let us know how many of the three releases you own! via Kenlu.

Air Jordan XIII ‘Flint’ – 1998 – 2005 – 2010 | Comparison

Air Jordan XIII ‘Flint’ – 1998 – 2005 – 2010 | Comparison

Air Jordan XIII ‘Flint’ – 1998 – 2005 – 2010 | Comparison

Air Jordan XIII ‘Flint’ – 1998 – 2005 – 2010 | Comparison

Air Jordan XIII ‘Flint’ – 1998 – 2005 – 2010 | Comparison

Air Jordan XIII ‘Flint’ – 1998 – 2005 – 2010 | Comparison

Continue Reading | Page 1 | 2 |


FILED IN: Air Jordans
TAGS:

28 Responses to “Air Jordan XIII ‘Flint’ – 1998 – 2005 – 2010 | Comparison”

  1. Shev Says:

    Straight feature but I know for sure that with your connects, you could have got better pairs of the OG and 05 to compare

  2. B-Ski Says:

    This has to be the most beat up comparison i've ever seen lol

  3. AF1('82)LDUB23('85) Says:

    I don't think people would agree with this quote (since sneakerheads want good quality again from the OG's): "The Fallen will Rise again." It would be cool if we see other AJ comparison in their aging process. (Like the AJ III's)

  4. marty Says:

    such an accurate comparison between the years. thanks!
    extremely pleased with my 13s

  5. TJC Says:

    god damn them 98's been through hell

  6. Chris Says:

    There's no way those '05s should be in that kondition. .

  7. @Frederickray Says:

    yall couldnt have found a ds pair of 13s how we suppose to compare

    Comare a junk yard car to a 2010

  8. duke101 Says:

    Here you go fellas!
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFDTXYJGgSI

  9. Steelo_Brown Says:

    That's exactly what I was going to say. It is hard to really grasp the differences when two of the three are pretty beat. Especially when it is not difficult at all to find DS '05s. DS OG's aren't that hard to come by either for that matter.

  10. @SpacejamHunter Says:

    those '98s are bad but i can't say sh*t i have OG 10s and 11s that look about that bad. I'm glad to have my Flints thats for sure. looking forward to more XIIIs.

  11. Steve Says:

    I like the comparision. Those 13's have aged just like MJ himself.

  12. Jerromino Says:

    Damn those OG's are beat up! It looks like they got wet from the discolor and separated sole. Bad comparison in my opinion. I've got shoes from that time and they are nowhere near that bad of a condition. Put those back in the trash. Nice try tho…

  13. TR3WATS Says:

    LMAO

  14. Corey Says:

    Wow 1998 and they're in that condition? Worn every day since 1998? Christ. Lazy comparison.

  15. Stretch Says:

    "wtf was done in them 98's lol smh"

  16. Luke Jay'Walker Says:

    '98s and '05 are looking better then the 2010 Bulls*it with no 3m

  17. aaron Says:

    Can't catch a break w you mofo's do y'all ever say anything nice, thought it was good to see
    Someone actually rock their kicks. Good sh!t!

  18. Digga Says:

    thats what I call a comparison!

  19. 1fLyGUY Says:

    Thats what i was thinking too

  20. Trey LaRoux Says:

    true that…gotta take better care of ya classics

  21. sal Says:

    lol

  22. sjbair Says:

    the 05's u can still fix but the oldest ones garbage

  23. Franklausky Says:

    I have the 98' and 2010's. I missed out on the 05's, had no idea they were being released. But, my 0G 98's look damn near as good as the 2010's, because I wore them every now and then until 2003. Gave them one last good cleaning and retired them. Pulled the 98's out this year since I knew it would break necks because of the new release and the glue started separating from the leather on the toe. That might have happened because of how I used to clean them. Nevertheless I will glue them back and get a full run out of them. Sorry for such a long post. I am warming up for a 10 page paper. Peace

  24. Borna Says:

    Might just go get my first pair. My best friend in middle school had a pair and I never understood the appeal. I was in georgetown the other weekend and I broke my neck peepin' a fresh pair. I traditionally buy all black jordans becuase of the maintenance, but I migeseht make an exception for these!

  25. benzjulz Says:

    Agree! This link has a better comp.

  26. raul Says:

    smh
    horrilbe comparrison

  27. jordan Says:

    that is horrible of what you did to does shoes man

  28. jordan Says:

    FUCK TIS SITE

Login or Register to Leave a Comment

Make sure to Register if you comment regularly. Registration is easy, it only requires your email and a username.

Leave a Comment as Guest:

Write Your Comment Here:





RECOMMENDED POSTS

© Liquidrice, Inc. | Sneaker News is a Liquidrice, Inc. Company

Page optimized by WP Minify WordPress Plugin