Archives
| | |
By Aaron Hope · Published Jul 07th, 2011
| Tweet | |

Sneakerheads by and large aren’t OK with changing the materials on a classic like the ‘Black Cement’ AJ3; can Jordan Brand get away with a sole swap on its immediate predecessor? The reception thus far for the Air Jordan 2.0 seems to suggest the answer is ‘yes’, its next colorway an impressive take on the old ‘Gucci’ standby palette. The key to nailing this look was the use of vibrant red and green tones rather than the deeper ones that tend to be more common, and though any white sole can’t stay pristine forever, it adds a nice finishing touch. Click through to see a bunch of new images and stick with Sneaker News for the US release date. via AGS
Air Jordan 2.0
455616-005


















July 7th, 2011 at 8:04 pm
Pass this attempt was a fail
July 7th, 2011 at 8:07 pm
NO SWAG LIL BE GOT SWAG THO
July 7th, 2011 at 8:28 pm
These got gucci outfit written all over them. Coppin
July 7th, 2011 at 8:29 pm
MAD SWAG WHILST HE FUCKS YO BITCH
July 7th, 2011 at 8:29 pm
these are ill. they look so much better on feet
July 7th, 2011 at 8:42 pm
kill yourself
July 7th, 2011 at 8:51 pm
hypebeast sneaker…
July 7th, 2011 at 8:52 pm
Nike, please retire the Jordan Brand with dignity. These revamped retros are detrimental to a legacy. Thank you.
July 7th, 2011 at 9:26 pm
I can fuck with the 2.0s but not the 8.0s
July 7th, 2011 at 9:41 pm
for real those 8.0s are some bull shit
July 7th, 2011 at 10:19 pm
niceeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee IMA COPP
July 8th, 2011 at 1:42 am
These look better than the travesty they call the 8.0
July 8th, 2011 at 2:26 am
Might cop as a rainy day shoe.
July 8th, 2011 at 8:42 am
Have you seen an actual pic of the 8.0's our are you just a follower?
July 8th, 2011 at 9:07 am
These kicks look far better on feet
July 8th, 2011 at 7:11 pm
I agree with you guys. A shoe can look crazy in and out of a box but if it doesnt look good on your feet whats the purpose in getting em. I like these but when are these hitting stores?
July 8th, 2011 at 9:11 pm
I agree