Sneaker News Blogs: Best of WDYWT – 3/13 – 3/19
Air Jordan XIII ‘Bred’ – Deon Chase – Boston, MA
Nike Air Huarache LE ‘Mowabb’ – Ben – Burlington, VT
Nike Air Force 180 – J Who – Dallas, TX
Nike SB Dunk Mid ‘Peacock’ – Deon Chase – Boston, MA
Air Jordan VII ‘Premio’ – Bright – Brooklyn
My little brother had those V's and I had the kids fire reds back when I was in 6th grade... Those are EXACTLY what they looked like... My brother hated that his didnt have the clear soles and the air bag but my kids air j' s did lol
I can't belive my New Balance 574 Made in Englands didn't make it. Makes a change from all the Nike. ah well.
Ahhahahaha you faggots beefing over a pair of 11-3 OG Js. It is nice to finally see who all the hypebeast-ass, non-OG wannabees are though. You busters need to go back to buying your kicks at Stride-Rite. YOU ARE NOT WORTHY.
Who picks these? Some are nice, but I can't see how they all made it into the top 20. There are far nicer kicks submitted this week than some shown here.
just letting you know, you posted the 2x pic of the lebron 7s in place of the j scott leopards ...or did you do that on purpose lol
Yo, I don't think them Air Jordan Retro V OG is autheno ! He should be fined and prosecuted fo even owning a pair of fake Air Jordan's, let alone, glorifying 'em..
Wow there are STILL people saying those Vs are fake even after the poster assessed it twice. You really think SN would put fakes in the Best Of?? Come on guys...
Got damn, they are fake. Shame on sneakernews and you and that lying poster and anyone saying 91, they are from 90, duh. These are fake, no 23 on any sizes under men sizes, the gs had clear soles period, these don't and surely arent infant or toddler and the worst is the og did not have a size tag on the inner side which these apparently do,HA, the tag(actual sheen tag I might mention) was tucked away under the elastic strap connecting the tongue to the sole. Those are as fake as anyone saying they are real. Again, nice try but sorry.
ILL WILLS, you're obviously not old enough to remember or too dumb to know that Kid Jordans came in 3 classes (they still do in fact): Toddlers: Sz 2 or 3 -10 Pre-School (PS): Sz 10.5 - 3 Grade School (GS)/Boy's: Sz 3.5 - 6 The pair shown here are most likely the Pre-School sizing which have NEVER EVER featured any Nike AIr-Sole technology whether visible or encapsulated. If you remember your size 4s having Air, it's because Grade-School sizes did have Visible Air. I know this for a fact cause my little sister had a pair. She's an OG too!
It happened before, but they removed the image haha. (fake F&F patta am1s.) but yes, I agree. The sky v's are legit. These newbie sneaker heads feel like they know everything.
My vote is for the lil dudes og "sky" Jordan V. If for no other reason all the rookie wannabe's calling them fake. Those kicks are 22 years old and hella crisp!
THEM WHITE 5 'S STR8 FOOGAZZY THEM SHITS AINT FROM DA 90'S THEY FROM SOME SHIT HOLE BOOTLEGGER.DA 23 WAS NOT ON THE SIDE OF DA SHOE. YALL SLEEP.
o dam.wat happened to the pik of my adidas jeremy scotts on the first page..those lebron 7s aint mine lol
Umm, nice try guys but they are fake and not gs. All 5's had clear bottoms, had size 4 back then in 4th grade. Even said Nike AIR also and had an airbag, only difference with them was the black/metallics were leather and mens was suede. Real talk from an og
Here you go "OG". These must be fake too since there is not an Icy sole and air on the back. http://jordansdaily.com/2011/08/02/sky-jordan-v-g...
Sounds like ur right, but a size 4 is "big kid sizes", which features more things; more so like the adult version. Besides, they dont make kids variants. Really no point. They are already 65 bucs. Lol
You're an idiot. Nike never put air bags in their infant/ps sized shoes until recent. Those are the first edition of the retro 5s. You're not an OG if you wore Jordan's in elementary school. You had no idea what you were wearing back then.