Air Jordan 1 Retro High OG “Royal”
February 5th, 2013 by Brendan Dunne | 26 comments
 |
Which retro will be next to dominate the headlines once the Air Jordan III ’88 is finally out there in the wild? If we had to wager a guess we’d say this would be it: the Air Jordan 1 ‘Royal’ that will also be coming with the ‘Nike Air’ detailing attached. The model is actually the Air Jordan 1 Retro High OG under official terms, the ‘OG’ part of the title being the one that designates that Nike Air addition. Continue reading for the latest set of angles on this exciting sneaker and keep in mind that the current release date we’ve got for the Air Jordan 1 ‘Royal’ is February 16th, 2013.
Air Jordan 1 Retro High OG
Black/Varsity Royal-Black
555088-085
02/16/13
Photos: Ameblo
Last released in 2001 coming back OG form again how r these not getting more attention
Too hot to pass up
I want em but if I dont get them oh well and never judge quality until you have them in hand.
Classic style classic colorway! Must cop!
Ugh I wish folks still thought 1s sucked. 2013....-__-
price?
right after midterms bossss
1 of 3 JB releases i want this year. the others being the lightning 4s and Grape 5s.
Can't wait...
Will def be scooping these up. Classic
can Feb 16 come any sooner!!! dammit
I know these will crease with the 1st step,but fuck it I love this cw so much im still coppn
I bet the swoosh is leather. And the interior lining look cheap. JB/Nike is raping dumb kids now days i dropped 85.00 with tax back in 01.
@Staxx13 Ever hear of inflation? 2.5% per year do the math your getting a deal
@Staxx13 And my parents used to tell me how bread was .25cents a loaf. Lol Just messing bro.
@Staxx13 that was back in 01' it's 2013 now....a whole different era player...
@Staxx13 who cares!?Its not 01 things change..hell wonder how your 01 look now??
A True OG look right here! A must cop for me....
breathe! it will be ok.
Lets go!!!!!
Can't wait!!! I was praying for the same quality leather as the banned 1s but..... Just a prayer. Still cop.
@Lilmr81 yeaaa right they would never and if they do they'll charge 180 plus.
@Jumpfan23 yep your absolutely right!!!
@Jumpfan23 @Lilmr81 Werent the banned's like $109 or somethin like that? U can see by the pix the quality isn't the same as the banned's.