Nike Zoom Revis “Snakeskin”
March 5th, 2013 by Aaron Hope | 13 comments
 |
The ‘Big Apple’ colorway of his first Nike Training signature just released this past week, but will Darrelle Revis still be playing football in New York come the start of the 2013 NFL season? Here’s a new Nike Zoom Revis that’ll satisfy fans on both coasts and everywhere in between, a sick Tiffany plus snakeskin combo that echoes key trends in both color and texture. The elite defender seems pleased with the design as you can see in more photos below, which also includes a first look at the logo that incorporates his number ’24′ with ‘RI’ for Revis Island. Let us know what you think of the ‘Snake’ Zoom Revis and be sure to check back with Sneaker News for release info.
Photos: John Geiger
This clown should not have his own signature shoe..these would sell if they were the marketed as a regular Nike training shoe worn by various NFL players and not exclusively one (injured) player's signature shoe..It looks like a decent shoe, but it's extremely overpriced and the only colorways that are being released are for Jets fans(green), ugly (black/red), or just too plain (grey)...What makes pisses me off even more about this shoe is that the only decent colorways are not being released to the public and put on display by Revis or his loser entourage member, Matt Geiger...Nike always drops the ball whenever they make NFL signature shoes..It's like a curse..look at the last NFL signature's: Michael Vick, Tim Tebow...now Revis..??..
That's a dope shoe! The only zoom Revis I've seen so far that I would consider buying.
@Steelo_Brown my exact words.....that snakeskin/aqua combo is tough
These are nice but I can't see myself paying $130 for any Revis shoe
@newsouth912 these aren't much different from the kd4s or lebron x lows. We'd pay 140 or 160 for those but not 130 for these? 130 is not bad when u consider the quality and technology behind these.
He's number 24 not 21
You don't see the 4 in the shirt. It's combined with the bottom of the 2
@newsouth912. Just realized they must've fixed it after seeing my post.
@LueMoua Yea. I didn't know what you were referring to. They do read the post and change it if you point out a mistake
@newsouth912. I see the 4 but I also see the 21 that the clueless writer wrote in the article.
These might be my first revis pickup if the price is right
Not crazy about these