366388

Nike Air Max 90 Premium – Cargo Khaki – Canyon Gold

Nike Air Max 90 Premium – Cargo Khaki – Canyon Gold

Nike Air Max 90 Premium Cargo Khaki Canyon Gold

The latest Nike Air Max 90 Premium release furthers the classic silhouette’s use of Hyperfuse, introducing a new blocking pattern that today employs a couple of colors we’ve seen in spades from Nike Sportswear this season. Both the Cargo Khaki and Canyon Gold shades have played a major role in the NSW catalog this quarter, and after having tackled a different template in CK and Volt, the AM90 PRM shows us what the olive base looks like with a mustard shade instead of neon. They miss the chance of being the ‘most’ HO12 of the whole catalog by using a Steel Green where Hasta might have earned a nod, but the right choice was made as you can see clearly after the jump below and when you pick up your pair from select NSW stores today.

Nike Air Max 90 PRM
Cargo Khaki/White-Steel Green-Canyon Gold
532470-317
$110

Nike Air Max 90 Premium Cargo Khaki White Steel Green Canyon Gold 1 570x380

Nike Air Max 90 Premium Cargo Khaki White Steel Green Canyon Gold 2 570x380

Nike Air Max 90 Premium Cargo Khaki White Steel Green Canyon Gold 3 570x380

Nike Air Max 90 Premium Cargo Khaki White Steel Green Canyon Gold 4 570x380

via ITSB

Latest News

Simplicity Succeds For The Nike SB Leo Baker "Navy/Gum"

We’ve made the claim before, but it really does feel like for hardcore fans of the label, the Nike SB roster is in a better...

by Matt Varga 22 mins
14

New Balance's Distressed 1906A Model Continues A Stellar Introduction In "Slate Grey"

Picking a favorite shoe is like picking a favorite child, but New Balance has tipped off their answer to that impossible question plenty in recent...

by Matt Varga 4 hours
197

Luka Doncic Sticks To The Homefront With The Jordan Luka 3 "Mavericks"

In an era where professional basketball is defining by player movement, often feeling like each successive season the league’s landscape gets shaken up more than...

by Matt Varga 6 hours
436